I
chose to study the text Reading
Essentials by Regie Routman,
since I knew of her work and that this book was recommended by some of my
friends and colleagues. In fact, of the many valuable ideas she shares, one I
had not used before was "Explain How You Choose Books to
Read" (30). I had not thought about
explicitly teaching this process, or even about my selection process: I
have always had books, loved books and bought books. Not all of my
students have the same experiences, so this is an item I need to add
to my practice.
Routman's
Reading Essentials is aptly named: she describes the non-negotiables, the
essentials for reading and for inspiring lifelong learners. She validates
teachers' knowledge and
judgment,
and postulates that teacher judgment is as valuable as scientific
research, and stating "Art and science must always work together"
(10). She addresses the need for teachers to respect the profession,
knowledge, and guidance of teachers, in pedagogy, in curriculum, in
selection of resources. I was shocked to read "As a profession, we suffer
from a collective lack of self confidence. We devalue our own knowledge
and experiences while over relying on scientific research" (5).
Actually I read that again. Yes, true, and my role is to support teachers
and encourage that knowledge and confidence, but how often have we negated
teacher input and insight in the demands for scientific research?
As I read through those non-negotiables, the reading essentials, I was humbled and encouraged that I had established priorities and patterns over the years that aligned with Routman's list of reading essentials. I loved the field of special education, often stating that it was the last bastion of autonomy in education: for years our professional judgement was considered valuable. I have always known my students as individuals, whether I had general or special education classes. I am adept at bonding and responsive teaching with students. These are my first priorities in coaching. So, I have some successes. But I have felt that harried need to meet increasing mandates and expectations that may be contrived, overburdened by being “constantly exhausted from an overstuffed curriculum and have no time to collaborate, reflect, and renew ourselves” (4). I and many of my colleagues have felt inadequate, frustrated, and defeated at times. Because we know that defeated teachers can not inspire or very effectively instruct, I have established protocols to guide decisions in my role to try to provide more time for teachers to collaborate, a safe environment in which to reflect, and opportunities for renewal and joy, for the teachers I serve and for me.
As I read through those non-negotiables, the reading essentials, I was humbled and encouraged that I had established priorities and patterns over the years that aligned with Routman's list of reading essentials. I loved the field of special education, often stating that it was the last bastion of autonomy in education: for years our professional judgement was considered valuable. I have always known my students as individuals, whether I had general or special education classes. I am adept at bonding and responsive teaching with students. These are my first priorities in coaching. So, I have some successes. But I have felt that harried need to meet increasing mandates and expectations that may be contrived, overburdened by being “constantly exhausted from an overstuffed curriculum and have no time to collaborate, reflect, and renew ourselves” (4). I and many of my colleagues have felt inadequate, frustrated, and defeated at times. Because we know that defeated teachers can not inspire or very effectively instruct, I have established protocols to guide decisions in my role to try to provide more time for teachers to collaborate, a safe environment in which to reflect, and opportunities for renewal and joy, for the teachers I serve and for me.
Routman's
list of “Focus on What Matters Most” held no surprises, but it was followed by “Ways
We Complicate our Teaching Lives” (7). The first item listed is "focusing
on procedures rather than on learning". The title of the Read to Succeed
course I am currently teaching educators is Instructional
Strategies. Routman's list convicts me and convinces me to keep these
admonishments in mind as I convey our District's commitment to quality literacy
instruction. Another item on this list is “focusing on strategies instead of
comprehension”. I want to be sure that I
am clear in setting expectations that focus on comprehension, even as we study Serravallo’s
The Reading Strategies Book.
Like
most teachers, I bring stories, make my classroom inviting, value
students' stories and read stories aloud and get to know my readers, as Routman
proposes. I need to improve my practice in sharing what she calls My
Reading Life. As much as I think about modeling strategies of skills, I have
not thought about modeling my reading life for students. Most importantly, I
need to defend our teachers from those “complications”, and “focus on what
matters most”.
Hi Lisa,
ReplyDeleteI appreciate your thoughtful reflection of Routman's chapter. I am thankful that the non-negotiables she identifies and discusses were validated in your practice. Like you, Routman's point that as educators we have become harried and hurried in a rush to teach an "overstuffed curriculum" and to meet new mandates pushed by educational reform resonated with me. I love how she reminds us that our effectiveness and our fulfillment comes from focusing on what matters most. Her suggestions of bringing stories, making our classrooms inviting, valuing students' stories, getting to know them as readers, and reading aloud were affirming and motivating. I'm glad you found a new suggestion Routman provided in sharing our reading lives helpful to guide your practice.